IceSave

Inspired By Iceland... no, really!

icelandic flag in spain.jpeg

It is funny how things can turn around. For decades, Iceland languished in neoliberal hell, with signs of opposition few and far between. Meanwhile the opposition to the neoliberal order of things grew all over the world—with massive protests in Seattle, Genoa and elsewhere—and the beginnings of a world-wide anti-globalisation movement represented by the World Social Forum, first held in Porto Alegre, Brazil, in 2001. Almost nobody in Iceland did or said anything to support these powerful movements against the neoliberal order, with the exception of the brave Saving Iceland organisation.

Le message de l’Islande au Portugal

Cette semaine, on a vu deux réactions très différentes à la dette européenne. A un bout de l’Europe, les électeurs islandais ont une nouvelle fois décidé de ne pas accepter les conditions de paiement de leurs « créanciers », les gouvernements britannique et néerlandais, à la suite de l’effondrement des banques islandaises en 2008. A l’autre bout, le Portugal est poussé dans la voie de la thérapie de choc par l’Union Européenne, et son peuple est écarté d’un processus qui changera sa vie de façon dramatique.

Why Iceland Voted ‘No” to the Diktats of the Creditor Banks

About 75% of Iceland’s voters turned out on Saturday to reject the Social Democratic-Green government’s proposal to pay $5.2 billion to the British and Dutch bank insurance agencies for the Landsbanki-Icesave collapse. Every one of Iceland’s six electoral districts voted in the “No” column – by a national margin of 60% (down from 93% in January 2010).

Icelanders Vote on Predatory Bailout: Nyet

In his April 8 article headlined, "The Economic Crisis in Iceland: 'IMF Medicine' is not the Solution," Michael Hudson asked:

"Will Iceland Vote 'No' on April 9, or commit financial suicide," their choice being:

Reject debt bondage or "subject their economy to decades of poverty, bankruptcy and emigration of their work force."

Le message des Islandais aux peuples d'Europe: ne payez pas pour la finance !

spron.jpg

Les Islandais viennent de refuser de payer pour la faillite des banques : ils ont dit "non" le samedi 9 avril par référendum, comme il l'avaient fait en mars 2010. Ce " non" a été soutenu par de nombreuses organisations de la société civile, dont Attac Islande. Non au remboursement de 3,9 milliards d'euros (soit 12 000 euros par habitant islandais, hors intérêts !) au Royaume-Uni et aux Pays-Bas : ces deux pays exigent de l'Islande qu'elle rembourse les sommes qu'ils ont dépensées pour dédommager les clients affectés par la faillite de la banque privée islandaise Icesave.

Attac á Íslandi óskar þjóðinni til hamingju með þjóðaratkvæðagreiðsluna um Icesave

Attac

Attac á Íslandi óskar þjóðinni til hamingju með þjóðaratkvæðagreiðsluna um Icesave á morgun. Með því að krefjast þess að greidd verði atkvæði um Icesave hefur almenningur sent þau skilaboð bæði til stjórnvalda á Íslandi og til umheimsins að hann borgi ekki þegjandi og hljóðalaust skuldir einkabanka. Íslenska þjóðin hefur sýnt að hún samþykkir ekki umyrðalaust að stjórnvöld þjóðnýti tap fjárglæframanna og sendi almenningi rekninginn.

Will Iceland Vote "No" on April 9, or commit financial suicide?

hudson-200x300.jpg

A year ago, in March 2010, Iceland's economy was so small that it did not warrant much attention when 93% of its voters rejected the Social Democratic-Green government's surrender to Gordon Brown and the Dutch, the European Union (EU) bureaucracy and IMF demands that it impose austerity as penance for believing the neoliberal fairy tales about how bank deregulation and "free markets" would make it the richest, happiest country in the world. Indeed it seemed to be, according to United Nations data.

Iceland, fight this injustice

joly.jpg

Saturday's referendum is a chance for Icelanders to strike at the conspiracy that leaves us all bailing out financiers

On Saturday the Icelandic people vote in a referendum on whether the Icelandic state and thus the citizens should guarantee the so-called Icesave claim. Icesave was a bank deposit account that promised market-leading interest rates. When the bank failed, the question arose if the Icelandic depositors' guarantee fund - a private institution financed by the banks - should have taxpayer backing. Instead of letting depositors lose their money or even wait for compensation from the bankruptcy estate, the governments of the UK and Netherlands (where the Icesave products where marketed) decided to reimburse depositors from their own countries. The reimbursement included the full principal, while the recklessly high-interest profits of the risk-seeking depositors were thrown in as a bonus.

Letter from Iceland on IceSave

10664_mass_protests-bring-down-government-1.jpg

In yet another turn of the IceSave saga, the people of Iceland are to vote on Saturday in yet another referendum on whether to accept collective responsibility for the debts of the failed Icelandic bank IceSave. We have received a following letter from a group of Icelanders which we republish here with our comments.

Questions for the ECB ahead of the Icelandic Icesave Referendum

a1_a_a_ice.jpg

A copy of the following letter has been sent by a small Icelandic group campaigning in advance of theforthcoming referendum on the terms of the Icesave deal with Britain and the Netherlands to several officials within the EU and EFTA as well as to the ministeries of Britain, Holland and Iceland to whom this case belongs. The letter has also been sent to several European newsmedia.

Reykjavik 18.03.2011

Mr Herman Van Rompuy
President of the European Council
European Council
Rue de la Loi 175
B-1048 Brussels
Belgium

Dear Mr Van Rompuy

Syndicate content